National Cancer Institute Home at the National Institutes of Health | www.cancer.gov
Please wait while this form is being loaded....
The Applied Research Program Web site is no longer maintained. ARP's former staff have moved to the new Healthcare Delivery Research Program, the Behavioral Research Program, or the Epidemiology & Genetics Research Program, and the content from this Web site is being moved to one of those sites as appropriate. Please update your links and bookmarks!

Validation Studies of the Techumseh Occupational Physical Activity Questionnaire (TOQ)

Walsh et al. 2004

See reference #36

Methods
Relation of TEE calculated from MLTPAQ and the Tecumseh Occupational questionnaire (TOQ), to body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), and free-living TEE (DLW) (ANOVA)
Sample
20 white and 21 black premeno-pausal women (over-weight, weight reduced and control); 20-46 years of age; 20 white and 14 black control women
Summary Results
Overestimation of EE (kcals/dy)-differences between TEC/ MNLTPAQ combined, and DLW
Overweight*
Black 981±284
White 869±388
Weight reduced*
Black 1016±521*
White 449±279
Control
Black 551±375
White 670±365
* p < 0.05

Relation between % body fat with over-estimation of EE by TEC/MNLTPAQ
Overweight 0.39*
Weight reduced NS
Controls NS

(NS-correlations not given)

[Return to top]

Ainsworth et al. 1999

See reference #66

Methods
Relationship between Tecumseh Occupational questionnaire (TOQ) and direct (7-day occupational activity records and Caltrac accelerometer) and indirect (maximal oxygen uptake and percent body fat) measures of physical activity status
Sample
46 women; 20-60 years of age
Summary Results

Correlations between TOQ (other than standing) and direct Caltrac and indirect (VO2 max) were NS

Correlations between TOQ activities and occupational Activity records:
-Walking, not carrying anything heavier than a briefcase
-METS/min/wk 0.73***
-hours/wk 0.32*
Total Light
-MET/min/wk 0.46***
-hours/wk 0.43**
Total moderate
-MET/min/wk 0.37**
-hours/wk 0.51***

* p < 0.05   ** p < 0.01   *** p < 0.001

[Return to top]

Philippaerts and Lefevre 1998

See reference #06

Methods
Relationship between the TOQ and 2 other PAQs (the BAQ and FCQ) and principal-components of TOQ and 2 other PAQs (component loading matrix)- no p values provided
Sample
90 Flemish males; 30, 35 and 40 years of age
Summary Results
Component
TOQ 1 2 3 4 5 6
-EE Work 0.91 -0.03 -0.03 0.33 0.09 -0.08
-Work index 0.86 0.04 0.15 -0.25 0.13 -0.25
-total activity index 0.84 0.06 0.47 0.05 0.11 0.08
-EE daily 0.81 -0.09 0.36 0.07 0.07 0.21
-time active during leisure 0.10 0.16 0.93 -0.01 0.08 -0.18
-EE during active leisure 0.21 0.14 0.92 0.05 0.06 0.19

[Return to top]

Wilbur et al. 1993

See reference #43

Methods
Relationship between Tecumseh Occupational questionnaire (TOQ) and Cardiorespiratory fitness established with a Monarch bicycle ergometer, BP, Ponderosity, and Self Report activity.
Sample
375 women, 73% white, 22% black; 33-63 years of age
Summary Results
  Occupational EE
BP
-systolic -.14*
-diastolic .01
Ponderosity .02
Cardiorespiratory Fitness .03
Self report:
Activity compared to others .07
Overall activity -.10*

* p < 0.05

[Return to top]

Ainsworth et al. 1993

See reference #11

Methods
Relation of TOQ categories (walking) and Comparable physical activity record book occupational activities
Sample
75 men and women; 23 to 59 years of age
Summary Results
  Activity Units/wk hrs/wk
Walking, not carrying anything heavier than a briefcase .41* .38*

* p < 0.05

[Return to top]

Last Modified: 11 Apr 2014