| Reference |
Methods |
Sample |
Summary Results |
| Philippaerts et al. 1999(5) |
Relation of the BAQ and 2 other PAQs to physical activity level (PAL) and average daily metabolic rate (ADMR) as measured with DLW (Pearson correlations) |
19 Flemish males aged 40 years of age |
| |
ADMR |
PAL |
BAQ |
-work index |
0.37 |
0.52* |
sport index |
0.46* |
0.55* |
-leisure time
index |
0.50* |
0.22 |
-total activity
index |
0.68** |
0.69*** |
* p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001 |
| Philippaerts and Lefevre 1998(6) |
Relation of physical activity between 3 levels of professional status of the BAQ and 2 other PAQs (the TCQ and FCQ) Relation of principal-components of BAQ and 2 other PAQs (component loading matrix)- no p values provided |
90 Flemish males; 30, 35 and 40 years of age |
| Component |
BAQ |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
-Work index |
0.70 |
0.09 |
0.03 |
-0.03 |
0.24 |
-0.41 |
-Total activity
index |
0.23 |
0.87 |
0.15 |
-0.02 |
0.23 |
-0.06 |
-Leisure time
index |
-0.09 |
0.60 |
0.10 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
-0.04 |
Work index of BAQ (0.70) scored high loadings and can be interpreted as a dimension of PA at work. BAQ total activity index (0.87) and leisure time index (0.60) loaded highly with physical activity during sports activities |
| Pols et al. 1996(7) |
Relation between BAQ and EPIC PAQ to a physical activity diary (12 d) as the main reference method, a single 24-h Caltrac accelerometer score, and energy intake estimated from a 24-h dietary recall repeated 12 times (Pearson correlation) |
33 women; 51-71 years of age |
| |
BAQ |
Pre-EPIC |
0.45* |
Diary |
0.51* |
Caltrac |
0.22 |
EI-recall |
-0.21 |
* p < 0.05 |
| Richardson et al. 1995(8) |
Relation between BAQ And peak oxygen consumption (VO2 pk), % Body fat (%BF), Caltrac accelerometer and 48 hr diaries (PA) (Pearson partial correlations adjusted for age) |
28 men and 50 women- Caucasian- in the ‘The Athero-sclerosis Risk in Communities’ (ARIC); 20-59 years of age |
| |
VO2 pk |
%BF |
Caltrac |
Men: |
Leisure |
0.13 |
-0.05 |
-0.05 |
Total |
0.57* |
-0.30 |
0.24 |
Women: |
Leisure |
0.38* |
-.51* |
0.06 |
Total |
0.46* |
-0.51* |
0.19 |
* p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001 |
| Miller et al. 1994(9) |
Relationship between BAQ and kcal estimates from Caltrac accelerometer and 2 other PAQs
(correlations) |
26 women and 7 men-Physical Therapists-mean age 28±6 years |
Caltrac |
0.40 |
3-day record |
0.13 |
7-day recall |
0.07 |
Godin |
0.61** |
NASA |
0.54 |
* p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001 |
| Jacobs et al. 1993(10) |
Relationships between BAQ and VO2 max, % body fat (%BF), Caltrac accelerometer (CAL) and 4 wk activity history (FWH) (Spearman correlations) |
28 men and 50 women-Caucasian-20-59 years of age. |
| |
VO2 max |
%BF |
CAL |
FWH |
Total |
0.54 |
-0.49 |
0.19 |
0.37* |
Work |
0.23 |
-0.17 |
0.11 |
0.05 |
Leisure |
0.26* |
-0.39* |
0.01 |
0.28* |
* p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001 |
| Ainsworth et al. 1993(11) |
Relationships between Baecke Occupational question and PA record scores (activity units) and other PAQs.
(Age- and gender-adjusted correlation coefficients) |
65 men and women; 23 to 59 years of age |
PA Record Scores
(activity units) |
.74 |
TOQ |
.09 |
HIP |
.38 |
Lipid Res Clinics |
.45 |
Minn Heart Health |
.16 |
Cardia |
.02 |
|
| Rauh et al. 1992(12) |
Relationship between items on the Baecke and Caltrac
(Pearson correlations) |
45 Latino (Spanish/English-speaking) adults, 53% male; mean age 33 years |
Baecke: |
Work |
0.42* |
Sport |
0.39* |
Leisure |
0.41* |
* p < 0.05 |
| Albanes et al. 1990(13) |
Relationship between BAQ and EI, REE and 7 other PAQs (Spearman correlations) |
21 men; 28-55 years of age |
EE |
0.38 |
EI-REE |
0.21 |
5-City Project |
0.16 |
Framingham |
0.57 |
Minn Leisure Time |
0.36 |
Health Insurance Plan |
0.78 |
Lipid Res Clinics |
0.68 |
Paffenbarger: |
Harvard U. Alumni |
0.56 |
U. Penn Alumni |
0.59 |
(No P-values provided) |
