|
|
Standardized Questionnaires of Walking & Bicycling Database:
|
|
|
Validation Studies of the Minnesota Leisure-time Physical activity questionnaire (MLTPAQ)
Walsh et al. 2004
See reference #36
- Methods
- Relation of TEE calculated from MLTPAQ and the Tecumseh Occupational questionnaire (TEC), to body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), and free-living TEE (DLW) (ANOVA)
- Sample
- 20 white and 21 black premeno-pausal women (over-weight, weight reduced and control); 20-46 years of age; 20 white and 14 black control women
- Summary Results
-
Overestimation of EE (kcals/dy)-differences between TEC/ MNLTPAQ combined, and DLW
| Overweight* |
| Black |
981±284 |
| White |
869±388 |
| Weight reduced* |
| Black |
1016±521* |
| White |
449±279 |
| Control |
| Black |
551±375 |
| White |
670±365 |
* p < 0.05
Relation between % body fat with over-estimation of EE by TEC/MNLTPAQ
| Overweight |
0.39* |
| Weight reduced |
NS |
| Controls |
NS |
(NS-correlations not given)
[Return to top]
Conway et al. 2002
See reference #37
- Methods
- Relation between a 4-wk history version of the MLTPAQ and the TEC and doubly labeled water (DLW)
- Sample
- 24 males; 42.0 ± 2.3 years of age
- Summary Results
-
Mean estimates of EE from questionnaires and DLW
| |
Mean |
R2 |
| EE MLTPAQ |
3.03±0.41 |
|
| EE TEC |
8.47±0.78 |
|
| EESLEEPMET |
2.29±0.09 |
|
| EE GEN |
1.17±0.12 |
|
| EEDLW |
13.55±0.38 |
|
| EE total 1 |
13.79±0.89 |
0.38** |
| EE total 2 |
14.87±0.90 |
0.39** |
EE total 1= EE MLTPAQ+ EE TEC EESLEEPMET
EE total2= EE MLTPAQ+ EE TEC EESLEEPMET+ EE GEN
** p < 0.001
[Return to top]
Tuero et al. 2001
See reference #38
- Methods
- Relation between MLTPAQ and fitness indicators: VO2 max and % BF (correlation coefficients)
- Sample
- 44 male and 38 females, Hispanic; 18-59 years of age
- Summary Results
-
| MLTPAQ |
Baseline |
12 month |
| |
V02 max |
BF |
VO2 max |
BF |
| Light |
-0.119 |
0.166 |
-0.223 |
0.196 |
| Moderate |
0.163 |
0.198 |
-0.117 |
0.95 |
| Heavy |
0.586* |
-0.287* |
-0.494* |
0.242* |
| Total |
0.190 |
-0.019 |
0.064 |
0.039 |
* p < 0.001
[Return to top]
Bonnefoy et al. 2001
See reference #39
- Methods
- Relationships between MLTPAQ and DLW and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max)
(Pearson and Spearman’s Correlation coefficients)
- Sample
- 19 men; mean age 73.4 ± 4.1 years
- Summary Results
-
| MLTPAQ: |
DLW-TEE |
VO2 max |
| -light intensity |
-0.15(-0.24) |
-0.05(-0.07) |
| -Moderate intensity |
0.05*(0.19) |
0.30(0.15) |
| -Heavy intensity |
0.28(0.47)* |
0.50*(0.54)* |
| -Total |
0.23(0.17) |
0.48*(0.38) |
* p <0.05
Spearman’s correlation coefficients in parenthesis
[Return to top]
Elosua et al. 2000
See reference #40
- Methods
- Relation between EE in PA obtained by MLTPAQ and BMI, HR at rest, after 3 min of exercise test and after 6 min of exercise test.
(Spearman correlation coefficients)
- Sample
- 250 Spanish women; 18-60 years of age
- Summary Results
-
| EE-PA: |
BMI |
HR |
HR-3 |
HR-6 |
ET |
| Total |
-0.129* |
-0.078 |
-0.214* |
-0.175* |
0.395* |
| -heavy |
-0.199* |
-0.158* |
-0.335 |
-0.283* |
-0.508* |
| -moderate |
-0.061 |
0.003 |
0.018 |
0.001 |
0.129* |
| -light |
-0.092 |
0.023 |
0.017 |
0.029 |
-0.017 |
| -household |
-0.268* |
0.034 |
0.139 |
0.105 |
-0.305* |
* p < 0.05
[Return to top]
Starling et al. 1999
See reference #41
- Methods
- Relation between Yale Physical Activity Survey (YPAS) and MLTPAQ and Caltrac uniaxial accelerometer, and doubly labeled water (DLW) in conjunction with indirect calorimetry (ANOVA)
- Sample
- 35 women and 32 men; 45- to 84years of age
- Summary Results
-
| Method: |
Physical Activity EE (kcals/d) |
| DLW |
| -men |
1211±429 |
| -women |
873±244 |
| MLTPAQ |
| -men |
459±288* |
| -women |
386±228* |
| CALTRAC |
| -men |
554±242* |
| -women |
379±162* |
* p < 0.05 compared with DLW
[Return to top]
Richardson et al. 1994
See reference #42
- Methods
- Relation between MLTPAQ and six 48-hour physical activity records, fourteen 48-hour Caltrac accelerometer readings, 3 VO2 peak determinations and percent body fat (%BF)
(Age- and gender-adjusted Pearson partial correlation coefficients)
- Sample
- 78 men and women; 20-59 years of age
- Summary Results
-
| |
T |
H |
M |
L |
HH |
| %BF |
-0.24* |
-0.24* |
-0.01 |
-0.15 |
-0.01 |
| (n) |
(75) |
(76) |
(76) |
(76) |
(75) |
| V02peak |
0.47** |
0.43** |
0.14 |
0.27* |
0.14 |
| (n) |
(75) |
(76) |
(76) |
(76) |
(75) |
* p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01
Summary Legend:
T = Total
L = Light
M = Moderate
H = Heavy
HH = Household
%BF = Percent Body Fat
VO2 max = vital capacity
[Return to top]
Jacobs et al. 1993
See reference #10
- Methods
- Relation between MLTPAQ and 9 other PAQs, and treadmill exercise performance and vital capacity (VO2 max, Forced Expiratory Volume(FEV), work load), body fatness, the average of 14 4-wk physical activity histories (4WH) and the average of 14 2-d accelerometer readings (Caltrac)
(age-adjusted correlation coefficients)
- Sample
- 78 men and women; 20-59 years of age
- Summary Results
-
| MLTPAQ |
| |
T |
L |
M |
H |
HH |
| CALTRAC |
| -kcal/d |
-0.06 |
-0.04 |
0.02 |
-0.01 |
0.08 |
| -min/d |
0.18 |
0.07 |
0.22 |
0.16 |
0.03 |
| 4WH |
| - T |
0.74 |
0.13 |
0.25 |
0.52 |
0.55 |
| -L |
0.27 |
0.83 |
-0.02 |
0.12 |
-0.09 |
| -M |
0.15 |
-0.09 |
0.75 |
0.12 |
-0.03 |
| -H |
0.74 |
0.11 |
0.22 |
0.86 |
0.08 |
| -HH |
0.40 |
-0.10 |
0.03 |
0.06 |
0.74 |
| WORKLOAD |
0.45 |
0.32 |
0.17 |
0.45 |
0.00 |
| %BF |
-0.24 |
-0.08 |
-0.07 |
-0.22 |
-0.08 |
| FEV |
0.09 |
0.10 |
-0.05 |
0.08 |
0.02 |
| V02 |
0.43 |
0.11 |
0.15 |
0.39 |
0.16 |
Summary Legend:
T = Total
L = Light
M = Moderate
H = Heavy
HH = Household
VO2 max = vital capacity
FEV = Forced Expiratory Volume
4WH = the average of 14 4-wk physical activity histories
Caltrac = the average of 14 2-d accelerometer readings
[Return to top]
Wilbur et al. 1993
See reference #43
- Methods
- Relationship between MLTPAQ Leisure activities and Cardio respiratory fitness established with a Monarch bicycle ergometer, BP, Ponderosity, and Self Report activity.
- Sample
- 375 women, 73% white, 22% black; 33-63 years of age
- Summary Results
-
| |
Leisure EE |
| BP: |
| -systolic |
-.00 |
| -diastolic |
-.06 |
| Ponderosity |
-.11* |
| Cardiorespiratory
Fitness |
.21** |
| Self report: |
| Activity compared to
others |
.24*** |
| Overall activity |
.23*** |
* p < 0.05 ** p < 0.001 *** p < 0.0001
[Return to top]
Albanes et al. 1990
See reference #13
- Methods
- Relationship between MLTPAQ past-week kcal and EI and summary estimates from other PAQs
(Spearman correlations)
- Sample
- 21 USDA employees;28-55 years of age
- Summary Results
-
| EI |
0.13 |
| EI-REE |
0.17 |
| 5-City Project |
0.48 |
| Framinham |
0.33 |
| Health Insurance Plan |
0.52 |
| Lipid Res Clinics |
0.63 |
| Paffenbarger: |
| Harvard U. Alumni |
0.54 |
| U. Penn Alumni |
0.47 |
(No P-values provided)
[Return to top]
|
|
