|
|
Standardized Questionnaires of Walking & Bicycling Database:
|
|
|
Validation Studies of the Techumseh Occupational Physical Activity Questionnaire (TOQ)
Walsh et al. 2004
See reference #36
- Methods
- Relation of TEE calculated from MLTPAQ and the Tecumseh Occupational questionnaire (TOQ), to body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), and free-living TEE (DLW) (ANOVA)
- Sample
- 20 white and 21 black premeno-pausal women (over-weight, weight reduced and control); 20-46 years of age; 20 white and 14 black control women
- Summary Results
-
Overestimation of EE (kcals/dy)-differences between TEC/ MNLTPAQ combined, and DLW
| Overweight* |
| Black |
981±284 |
| White |
869±388 |
| Weight reduced* |
| Black |
1016±521* |
| White |
449±279 |
| Control |
| Black |
551±375 |
| White |
670±365 |
* p < 0.05
Relation between % body fat with over-estimation of EE by TEC/MNLTPAQ
| Overweight |
0.39* |
| Weight reduced |
NS |
| Controls |
NS |
(NS-correlations not given)
[Return to top]
Ainsworth et al. 1999
See reference #66
- Methods
- Relationship between Tecumseh Occupational questionnaire (TOQ) and direct (7-day occupational activity records and Caltrac accelerometer) and indirect (maximal oxygen uptake and percent body fat) measures of physical activity status
- Sample
- 46 women; 20-60 years of age
- Summary Results
-
Correlations between TOQ (other than standing) and direct Caltrac and indirect (VO2 max) were NS
Correlations between TOQ activities and occupational Activity records:
| -Walking,
not carrying anything
heavier than a briefcase |
| -METS/min/wk |
0.73*** |
| -hours/wk |
0.32* |
| Total Light |
| -MET/min/wk |
0.46*** |
| -hours/wk |
0.43** |
| Total moderate |
| -MET/min/wk |
0.37** |
| -hours/wk |
0.51*** |
* p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001
[Return to top]
Philippaerts and Lefevre 1998
See reference #06
- Methods
- Relationship between the TOQ and 2 other PAQs (the BAQ and FCQ) and principal-components of TOQ and 2 other PAQs
(component loading matrix)- no p values provided
- Sample
- 90 Flemish males; 30, 35 and 40 years of age
- Summary Results
-
| Component |
| TOQ |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| -EE Work |
0.91 |
-0.03 |
-0.03 |
0.33 |
0.09 |
-0.08 |
| -Work
index |
0.86 |
0.04 |
0.15 |
-0.25 |
0.13 |
-0.25 |
| -total activity
index |
0.84 |
0.06 |
0.47 |
0.05 |
0.11 |
0.08 |
| -EE daily |
0.81 |
-0.09 |
0.36 |
0.07 |
0.07 |
0.21 |
| -time active during leisure |
0.10 |
0.16 |
0.93 |
-0.01 |
0.08 |
-0.18 |
| -EE during active leisure |
0.21 |
0.14 |
0.92 |
0.05 |
0.06 |
0.19 |
[Return to top]
Wilbur et al. 1993
See reference #43
- Methods
- Relationship between Tecumseh Occupational questionnaire (TOQ) and Cardiorespiratory fitness established with a Monarch bicycle ergometer, BP, Ponderosity, and Self Report activity.
- Sample
- 375 women, 73% white, 22% black; 33-63 years of age
- Summary Results
-
| |
Occupational EE |
| BP |
| -systolic |
-.14* |
| -diastolic |
.01 |
| Ponderosity |
.02 |
| Cardiorespiratory
Fitness |
.03 |
| Self report: |
| Activity compared to
others |
.07 |
| Overall activity |
-.10* |
* p < 0.05
[Return to top]
Ainsworth et al. 1993
See reference #11
- Methods
- Relation of TOQ categories (walking) and Comparable physical activity record book occupational activities
- Sample
- 75 men and women; 23 to 59 years of age
- Summary Results
-
| |
Activity Units/wk |
hrs/wk |
| Walking, not carrying anything heavier
than a briefcase |
.41* |
.38* |
* p < 0.05
[Return to top]
|
|